Tropical Fish Forum

Tropical Fish Keeping Help and Advice => The Emergency Room => Topic started by: Cora on June 03, 2016, 05:28:11 PM

Title: Ammonia false positive? SOLVED
Post by: Cora on June 03, 2016, 05:28:11 PM
As followers of Project: Fishy 185 will know, I have a 70L tank currently.

I did a 50% water change on Wednesday and cleaned the filter in tank water, giving the sponges a good squeeze but that's all. I also installed a bag of Seachem Purigen.

I tested the water just now and got ammonia readings of at least 2ppm! So either my fish are in clear and imminent danger or something is giving a false reading. Unfortunately I didn't test after the water change so have no point of reference, but even if I destroyed all the bacteria (which I surely didn't) 2ppm in less than 48 hours in a tank with a 50% water change?? Surely not.

My fish appear fine and healthy - and are eating well. They are all active and in no signs of distress. Even injecting 1-2ml ammonia solution into my new tank didn't produce readings this high!

I used a clean syringe. I used a test tube which had been sat in tap water but was relatively dry. Could this give a false reading??
Title: Re: Ammonia false positive?
Post by: Cora on June 03, 2016, 05:38:51 PM
I have retesting using a brand new syringe and two clean and dry test tubes.

Nitrites are ZERO.

Ammonia second test shows 0.25-0.50 ppm.

A remarkable difference from the first reading! This means that the first reading must have been contaminated somehow. Even so, positive ammonia and zero nitrites - is this a symptom of a filter clean and water change? Does it mean my cycle has restarted from scratch? The latter of the two seems very unlikely.

So, emergency over... but I'm slightly worried.
Title: Re: Ammonia false positive?
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2016, 07:08:49 PM
Any trace of chemical in the tube has the potential to distort the reading of the next test.
I've seen a video of one manufacturer saying that you should never use a tube to do more than one kind of test; the video showed how to mark each tube so it was only ever used for one type of test. To my mind, that is a bit extreme - provided the tubes are washed properly between tests.

I use the technique we used in research labs at uni. Empty the tube then rinse a couple of times in cold water. Then half fill and shake, repeating three or four times. Here I diverge a bit as I don't have supplies of acetone to rinse the water out of the tube, so I use a paper tissue to poke down the tube to dry it. If the tissue shows any staining at all (easily seen on white) I wash the tube again. If necessary, use a small bottle brush.
I also know from experience that if tubes are washed immediately there is less residue stuck to the glass.

I have learned recently that we are supposed to take the test sample from at least three inches below the surface as debris floating near the surface can interfere with the reading. This applies to all tests.

And of course there could be a blip in the test procedure. Did we mis-count the drops? Was one of the drops a bit smaller/larger than the others? Etc etc.


And if I get a suspect reading, I test again using another tube.
Title: Re: Ammonia false positive?
Post by: Extreme_One on June 03, 2016, 11:26:31 PM
I follow a similar cleaning routine to Sue.

And if I get a suspect reading, I test again using another tube.

This is invaluable advice.

If the test comes back positive twice, using a different tube for the second, then I know positive means positive.
Title: Re: Ammonia false positive?
Post by: Cora on June 04, 2016, 09:19:05 AM
Cheers, guys.

I used paper towels to clean and dry the tubes. I could do with a bottle brush.

Interesting about taking a sample from well below the surface. I'll do that next time.

I just can't wait to get the fish from the 70l into the new tank! It will be so much better for them.
Title: Re: Ammonia false positive?
Post by: fcmf on June 04, 2016, 09:22:08 AM
I have learned recently that we are supposed to take the test sample from at least three inches below the surface as debris floating near the surface can interfere with the reading. This applies to all tests.
And of course there could be a blip in the test procedure. Did we mis-count the drops? Was one of the drops a bit smaller/larger than the others? Etc etc.
Very useful tip about where to take the test sample from - thanks, Sue.
Yes, I often find a drop seems more of a bubble than a drop and have to make a decision whether to add an extra one or not.