See less of these, become a Super Subscriber today!

Fishkeeping In 1984

Author Topic: Fishkeeping in 1984  (Read 1301 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Fishkeeping in 1984
« on: August 01, 2017, 07:46:15 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I've just picked up an old fishkeeping book...  it's full of undergravel filters etc that we wouldn't recommend at all now...

Full book review to come... It won't be positive!!!  :isay:

Offline hampalong

  • Fishy Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
  • Likes: 6
  • aka Mark
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2017, 01:43:20 AM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I still recommend UG filters. The concept works, and they're easy to keep clean if done right. The biggest healthiest Amazon Swords I ever saw were grown in 6" of small gravel on UG with quite a high turnover.

Offline Sue

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7089
  • Likes: 113
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2017, 09:16:01 AM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
My understanding has been that there are a few drawbacks to UG filter - including that you can't put live plants in them as the water flow damages the plant's roots  ???. And no rocks/wood as they create dead areas in the gravel because there is no water flow underneath them.
And worst of all for me - unless you have a reverse flow UG, you have to take everything out once a year to clean the muck out from under the plates. A reverse flow UG with a prefilter on the pump doesn't need to be taken down.
I have also read comments that modern UG plates are not very well made and split easily.

Have I just been reading negative comments by UG haters?



However I do understand that UGs are excellent biofilters because of the volume of the media - all the gravel.

Offline hampalong

  • Fishy Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
  • Likes: 6
  • aka Mark
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2017, 09:47:23 AM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
UGs only work well with plants if the gravel is deep enough.

You don't need to take them out and clean them, that's what gravel cleaners are for. A siphon tube down the uplifts once in a while removes the (inert) mulm from under the plates.

Reverse flow is pretty much the same but fills the gravel from bottom up father than top down.

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2017, 10:53:54 AM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I can already se that this book review I have planned is going to create some debate... might even have to go chapter by chapter!!

FYI the book is dated 1984.


Offline Sue

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7089
  • Likes: 113
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2017, 06:53:30 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
The books I got from the library back in the 1990s were this age or older. I remember one of them saying don't do a water change for a month before you go on holiday  :o

Offline hampalong

  • Fishy Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
  • Likes: 6
  • aka Mark
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2017, 07:10:35 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I started in 1972, and after a couple of new-tank-syndrome wipeouts I happened to find someone near me who knew what they were doing.

I had some books from the 70's and 60's that were pretty good, but others weren't. Just like the internet today.

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2017, 07:42:42 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
Ok so new thread and time to get started. 

I've decided not to give too much away about the book as the purpose of this thread is not to say that the book is all wrong, more simply that fishkeeping has advanced/changed since.  So the title of the book is all I shall give. I know of course you will be able to find out more should you wish but I want a clear conscious...

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2017, 07:45:52 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
So page 10 is where the book gets going and by page 11 we have the first point of interest... the book states:

"most people only associate with the Goldfish in its humble, unsuitable bowl"

It surprises me that the goldfish bowl is still around given that over 30 years ago is was seemingly already well know of the unsuitability of these as tanks...

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2017, 07:49:10 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
Page 12 contains a special message for one of our members...

"when the hobby begins to take over and more tanks are needed, the rest of the family might not share your enthusiasm quite so much!"

It even recommends:

"extending their aquatic interest out ... into a fishhouse where extra breeding tanks can be accommodated without taking up valuable living space in the house"

Offline Littlefish

  • Super Subscriber!
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
  • Likes: 92
  • aka Donna
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #10 on: August 03, 2017, 07:53:01 AM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
@Matt did you see the really small print footnote that reads "alternatively, keep the fish in the house and move any unenthusiastic family members out to separate accommodation. Or if you live on your own just go wild"? Sometimes these old books can make a lot of sense.  ;D

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2017, 07:57:13 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
Ok so we're on to stocking.  This seems to be governed by oxygen levels in the tank for use by the fish and hence surface area of the tann.

"Each 2.5cm (1 in) of fish body length should have approximately 150cm2 (24in2) of water surface allocated to it"

"This is now the accepted method of 'sizing' a fish tank for its inhabitants, and is more accurate then the out-moded 'X litres (gallons) for each Y centimetres (inches) of fish's method, I which disregards the crucial factor of the water surface area"

Ill draw no conclusions and let the debate begin!!

Offline Sue

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7089
  • Likes: 113
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #12 on: August 03, 2017, 08:09:48 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
The surface area rule for stocking usually assumes no water movement. One book I read said this is in case the filter fails when you are not around to notice (night, at work, on holiday). The tank should always be stocked as though the tank had no water movement or the fish would die should the filter fail.

I always thought the surface area rule pre-dates the volume rule  ???

Offline marquismirage

  • Rocking Fishy Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
  • Likes: 12
  • aka Mark
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #13 on: August 03, 2017, 10:29:43 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I always thought the surface area rule pre-dates the volume rule  ???

I thought so too as it was before electrical filtration and air pumps.

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #14 on: August 05, 2017, 12:52:15 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I'm on to tank furnishings... not one I've come across before, but cork bark is recommended for both a cave like structure or as a background.  Actually nor a bad idea...

Offline Sue

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7089
  • Likes: 113
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2017, 01:18:42 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
Silly question but is cork bark the same stuff that bath mats and table mats are made of? If it is, won't any decor float  ???

Offline Littlefish

  • Super Subscriber!
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
  • Likes: 92
  • aka Donna
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2017, 02:18:50 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I've got cork bark in the mudskipper tanks, and they like using it for tunnels & caves - only on the land part because yes it does float. I floated some on the water and was trying to convince one of the fish to use it as a raft, but he was not impressed.  ::)
I've seen clips of other mudskippers using cork bark pieces as a raft and floating around in the flow from the filter.

Offline Matt

  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Likes: 21
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2017, 04:21:11 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
Sue I think its a more natural product than the stuff you are thinking of, my parents have it as floor tiles... this is the bark of a cork tree and looks like bark as you would find it on the tree. I think I made no sense there... ahh well

Offline Sue

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7089
  • Likes: 113
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2017, 04:25:13 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
I thought it had to be something different but had no idea what. I somehow can't visualise tank ornaments made of the same stuff as wine corks  ;D

Offline Littlefish

  • Super Subscriber!
  • Hero Think Fishy Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
  • Likes: 92
  • aka Donna
Re: Fishkeeping in 1984
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2017, 06:01:38 PM »
  • Likes On This Users Post 0
Perhaps I have quite a bit of pith on the cork bark I have. I got it in the reptile section of the LFS. It is cork branches that have had the middle hollowed out, so the outside looks like normal tree bark, but the inside is quite smooth and lighter. The stuff I have does float, and if I ever get one of my fellas to ride a piece like a raft I promise to take a picture.  ;D

See less of these, become a Super Subscriber today!

See less of these, become a Super Subscriber today (see below)

** Become a ThinkFish Super Subscriber **

It takes time and money to keep ThinkFish going, if you'd like to help, then a one off Donation or a Subscription of your choice would be fantastic. Starting from less than 2p per day; your subscription will help fund new articles, pay for server costs and help fund development and promotion initiatives, helping us bring you more of the good stuff you love! You'll also see less ads. Why not become a Super Subscriber today!?
Tags:
 

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 

Think Fish © 2004-2018 | Keeping Tropical Fish Forum - Everything you need for your Tropical Fish hobby

Tropical Fish Help and Advice
Tropical Fish Keeping Community
General Non-Fishkeeping Chat
Legal | Contact
SEO Services in Kent
Follow Think Fish on: