Thanks for the heads up Colin, sounds like you have connections in the sleazy world of class A street buffers Trust me, I won’t be upsetting you in a hurry.

Perhaps I have been unlucky but I thought had a really good pH meter from Extech, it had a good write-up, very good spec, replaceable probes and could accept other probe types to measure ORP as well. So my logic was that it should have out-lasted the probes that don't live forever, I wouldn’t have to buy test kits and it would more importantly be more accurate as I was injecting CO2.
Within a week of getting it the pH reading started constantly cycling 0.3pH in the calibration buffer. That was in Jan of this year, I'm still trying to get my money back. Grrrrr !
If anybody is thinking of buying stuff from Armco or Air concern JUST DONT !! Their tech and customer support royally stinks and I have 59 (and counting) Emails to prove it.
I'm not sure about the costs of the materials, you may be correct but in many cases a kg of lab quality chemical (Colin, that's 'gear' in your circles) is very cheap. Plus half the fun for me is the learning process, and yes I am aware that this is weird.
The way I justify it to myself is as follows.
A pH probe always has to be calibrated at two points and fairly regularly - at least monthly therefore buffer is a consumable item at about £20/litre and you need two buffer solutions. My calibration curve would be a one time job and once I have it the software just loads it into the colourimeter each time I do a test.
The only thing a colourimeter does is to replace the human eye when it comes to reading the colours. Once it knows the relationship between the sample colour and pH from the calibration curve it is many times more accurate than the eye and the stupid colour cards that test kits provide. [The scraping sound you hear is me getting my test kit colour card soap box out - sorry]
I now get repeatability between NO3 tests (different water samples from the same tank) within 2 or 3ppm. I absolutely know it’s not important for NO3 to be that accuracy, but it’s the test I do most regularly so I have the most experience and can quote numbers. This compares to ‘Hey Pet, what do you think this is 40 or 80ppm?’ with a card.
It always seemed strange to me that in the case of Ammonia the rule is ALWAYS ZERO yet my kit starts reading at 0.25ppm and goes up to 8ppm ! - where 0.5ppm is said to causes stress and harms fish. On some of the cards it’s hard to see the difference between two colours or as you open a new pack you notice a significant difference between the two. This just seems wrong to me and devalues the test kits.
My last Ammonia test was 0.07ppm and I would be confident that if I retested the same water I would be within a couple of hundredths of a ppm of this reading, with this resolution I can spot a problem well before it affects the poor blighters in the tank.
Yes I hear you shout, but this would read zero on a card. True I would shout back, but only if the card colour match is correct, and then we all go off in a big huff

Sorry this went off the pH topic a tad.
Regards, Andy the weird minion.