I think the problem, as I'm aware you're asking these sorts of questions elsewhere too, is that there will always be a range of opinions and views; the more you get, the more confusing it will become. Sometimes people ask questions and try to find a midway point between them all which isn't the wisest; other times, people ask questions hoping that answers will fit in with what they really want and justify that desire. I think it's best to stick to the 'bona fide' sources as a bare minimum from where to start, then find out if there are any nuggets of useful advice that expand upon that ie are in line with it but add more to it.
For example:
*if I had a 30-litre tank and thought that I'd like cardinal tetras, I'd check Thinkfish and Seriously Fish profiles, realise that they're advocating a 60cm-length tank as the minimum size tank, and then discount them as a potential option for stocking - I wouldn't start asking questions about whether or not I might be able to keep them, otherwise folk will give all sorts of answers like managing to squeeze them into a 20L tank without any problem, etc, and I might get lots of these answers which may start to convince me that it's do-able after all and simultaneously this would dilute the 'bona fide' evidence (which it oughn't to do);
* if I had a love of platies but, checking the Thinkfish and Seriously Fish profiles, realised that my water was far too soft for them and that I wouldn't be able to use reverse-osmosis water, I would discount them as a potential option for stocking - I wouldn't start asking questions about whether or not I might be able to keep them, otherwise those that are keeping them in softer water will pipe up that it's no problem, and the weighting I'd attribute to those answers might outweigh the 'bona fide' evidence (which it oughtn't to do).