Don't you really need to know the power used per LED, then you can work out the number of LEDs in the length you use and hence the power required?
I light my whole average sized sitting room adequately using three compact fluorescent light bulbs each of 23 watts for a total of 69 watts. LEDs are more efficient than fluorescent lighting. It seems to me therefore that only a relatively small number of LEDs should be more than enough to light a normal sized tank. My aim in changing to LEDs is to save money on electricity, not to make the lights any brighter. Am I missing something? Wouldn't a 5 metre length be enough for an enormous tank? The seller said that the 5 metre length I bought would use 72 watts total. That would have to be divided among several tanks to make it more economical than the existing tubes.
I have one flexible "rubbery" strip which is 1.2 metres length and has 120 LEDs, plain old 3528 single ones. It is constructed such that it bends round corners easily without twisting, unlike the flat strips that are sold in 5 metre lengths. It easily provides enough light for a 60 litre/60 cm. tank (glued internally in a U shape). It uses 9 watts, less than a third of the consumption of the two 15 watt tubes there before, while providing at least as much light and cost just £8.99 with power supply. It's a pity that 1.2 metres seems to be the longest length available, longer and you can only get the flat tape type. I have 3 more 60 cm tanks which I plan to light in the same way. I may add a red strip later to enhance colours. The electricity savings should be considerable, after all 12 hours a day @ 30w = 0.36 kwh/day while the same @ 9w = 0.108 kwh/day. If I can do the same sort of thing with the other 8 tanks I have that use fluorescent tubes then I can afford to run a couple more tanks!! I'm still working out the best way to use the flat strips on the larger tanks.
The biggest mistake that people can make is trying to use a watt by watt comparison when converting to LEDs. The problem is there are many different types, each producing light more or less efficiently than the others. For example, the 3528 LEDs you mention are pretty dim and inefficient. The 5m/72watt strips you mention will be 5050 chips, which are still fairly inefficient, but produce the most light per £. There are now the 5630 LEDs that are more expensive to buy initially, but are brighter than the 5050's and more efficient to run (so cheaper long term). Comparatively, a 1m strip of each type will output approximately 216, 756, and 1536 lumens respectively, but use 4.8, 14.4, and 24 watts for that light.
To compare to an iridescent light, such as your compact fluorescents, you need to be looking at the light produced by both types of light (usually in lumens). Compact fluorescents are already pretty efficient lights. LEDs will save a bit on the running cost, but also have the advantage of not having to warm up, are much more controllable, longer life etc.
If the light in your 60 litre aquarium outputs 750 lumens, for example (which is what a single 24" 20w Hagen Power-Glo produces), you would need either of the below for the equivalent light output in LEDs:
3528: 3.5 metres - 756 lumens - 16.8 watts
5050: 1 metre - 756 lumens - 14.4 watts
5630: 0.5 metres - 768 lumens - 12 watts.